Latest on Global Warming Solutions Act

            In 2006, the Legislature and Governor enacted the Global Warming Solutions Act, which sets an overall cap on greenhouse-gas emissions (including carbon dioxide, methane nitrous oxide and hydrofluorocarbons) and within that cap allows companies who emit less than their individual  credits to sell their excess emissions capacity to companies that would otherwise exceed theirlimits.  The law requires total emissionsin the State to be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020—representing a 25% reduction.

            Since its passage, theimplementation of the law has undergone challenges which have been turned back by the Courts and at the ballot box.  One challenge was by a group of minority-group advocates, who contended that the provision of the law allowing companies to buy extra emissions credits means that low-income communities, which allegedly have a disproportionate number of polluting industries in the communities’ midst, would actually suffer from increased greenhouse-gas emissions even as the overall emissions in the State went down.  Another challenge was through proposition 23, which if approved would have put emissions caps on hold until unemployment had been reduced to a much lower level than the presentlevel.  As noted, neither challenge was successful.

            Now, new controversy has arisen over the law.  At least 4 bills (AB 1532,  Assemb. Memb. Perez, D-Los Angeles; AB 2404, Assemb. Memb. Fuentes, D-Los Angeles; SB 1572, Sen Pavley, D-Agoura Hills; and SB 237, Sen. Wolk, D-Davis) are now pending which would increase revenues from
the State’s distribution of credits and would allow the State to use those revenues for other, environmentally-related programs.

            Business groups, led by the California Chamber of Commerce, vigorously oppose these bills.  The business groups argue that the original intent to the Global Warming Solutions Act was not to raise tax revenue and fund additional spending but rather to raise only enough money to enable the State to administer the Act.  Business argues that turning the Act into a tax-and-spend measure will only increase burdens on an already-struggling economy and will result in even more companies leaving the State/declining to enter the State than is already the case.

            While opponents of the Act have lost previous struggles challenging the Act’s implementation, present opposition to increasing charges and spending related to the Act may resonate with the public.  According to the August 2, 2012 edition of the Contra Costa Times, a Public Policy Institute poll conducted from July 10-24 shows that 65% of Californians have little or no confidence that the State would wisely spend money generated by revenues raised. Moreover,the poll shows that 57% of those surveyed know nothing about how permits will be distributed under the Act, while 30% said they had heard a little about this and only 12% professed that they had heard a lot.

            You can find the Contra Costa Times’ report at http://www.contracostatimes.com/politics-government/ci_21213313/more-than-half-californians-say-they-know-nothing?source=rss. These numbers, if accurate, suggest that the public-relations battle over whether to raise the revenues originally contemplated under the Act and then distribute those revenues to various programs is a battle winnable by eitherside of the argument.

            As if anticipating the controversy of placing additional costs on business, this past Monday, July 30, the Air Resources Board (the entity empower to implement the Act) said it was considering simply giving away an increased number of greenhouse-gas credits during the Act’s first two-year compliance period, 2012-13.  The Board indicated it would judge the likelihood of various  industries leavingthe State and would attempt to concentrate the free credits on those industries.  Among the industries being mentioned for receiving increased free credits are cement production, oil refining and food production.

(Article originally published in my column, "Legal News You Can use", appearing in the Valley News Group of papers, San Fernando Valley, California).

 

Comments

[definition essay topic]

A poorly written introduction can result in a poor grade no matter how well-written the rest of the essay is.

[course works]

Show how the example leads to more general conclusions about the topic. (If possible, relate to material from the introduction to round the essay off.)

[custom essay writing service]

Man with the Elites living topside in proper society, and the literal underground culture eating meat and smoking and drinking, beyond the reach of the law.

[essay writing]

It can safely be said that our writers are more capable and can come up with better

[Beats By Dre Australia]

Also, some high-performing schools might be closed, as a result of building conditions and capacity.Many parents and activists believe it could be cheaper to appease the opponents

[casino online games]

Man with the Elites living topside in proper society, and the literal underground culture eating meat and smoking and drinking, beyond the reach of the law.

[Kozma]

Posted on A great story. Yours, is a journey I've gone over in my mind, many times. With some mfotdicaiions music, phone and other links. I've catalogued a number of practical' reasons why I can't take the journey at this time. but your journey and reading Advanced Riskology' (where I got the link to this site) has brought the trek closer and more realizable. Thanks.Errol

[Heiner]

It is a pretty untonfurate way of thinking from the Guardian when ending up under a bus is what comes to mind on the idea of cycling.Otherwise, how does the fact that cycling burns more calories than not cycling imply that a cyclist would also eat more than a non-cyclist? The assumption that no overweight people (i.e. those who do not cycle but still eat the cheeseburgers) exist in Britain is a bit overly simplistic for me.

[Laari]

Jo Posted on Kai, I loved this story! I am so glad I met you in my living room, ;-), and got cuoirus as to what you were up to now. You are such an amazing source of inspiration and have such a beautiful spirit.This story was great. While I can easily get in a car and drive across country and have some excellent reflective moments, I'd never do it without music, staying in a tent, or not speaking! Wow. The outcome was amazing. I call that a spiritual experience. I always try to listen to my gut, because it talks to me. Sometimes I forget to listen. What a great story to remind us all to keep in tune.

[SEO Agency]

If the savings is 2 hutderdnhs of one percent, then it would take 200 such projects to save one percent.

[PalmTee]

We will beomce carbon free if we set out to beomce free from the menace of CO2 imbalance and are prepared to do whatever we can to reduce our carbon emissions. Artificial Palm Tree

[Robert]

Now wait. If the savings is 2 hutderdnhs of one percent, then it would take 200 such projects to save one percent. The figures I can find say that the rate of increase of carbon emissions from 2000 through 2005 was about 2.5 percent per year. So, that's about 15 percent or so up through 2006 which means you would need 3000 such projects to bring the level back to the 2000 rate.

[Sushil]

They probably want us to all be vagateriens too, so no need for fires to cook on, and we'd be required to use passive solar heating to keep warm (at least, until we froze to death!) It'll end up looking like Demolition Man with the Elites living topside in proper society, and the literal underground culture eating meat and smoking and drinking, beyond the reach of the law.

[cris_gabe143]

there are a lot of ways that we can prevent global warming.It is just the all the people don't act on their side shower

[Web Design Agency]

Chris, then perhaps it will help us to find ways to move further towards our goal of bringing down CO2 levels to 350ppm.

[Roulette francese]

will help us to find ways to move further towards our goal of bringing down CO2 levels to 350ppm.

[online casino]

Carbon Free is more of an attitude of mind. We will beomce carbon free if we set out to beomce free from the menace of CO2 imbalance

[payday loans]

then perhaps it will help us to find ways to move further towards our goal of bringing down CO2 levels to 350ppm.

[Nawal]

Carbon Free is more of an attitude of mind. We will beomce carbon free if we set out to beomce free from the menace of CO2 imbalance and are prepared to do whatever we can to reduce our carbon emissions.If Carbon Free Sunday helps to raise awareness of just how difficult it is to be totally free from generating carbon emissions, like it has for you, Chris, then perhaps it will help us to find ways to move further towards our goal of bringing down CO2 levels to 350ppm.

[Nathan Moore]

It's so hard to implement a solution for the global warming if the people have no respect in nature..

[Jennifer]

7waystosunday / Dude this is soo goo! I really enyjoed it!Ahh I remember the days running through ashenvale (before we got mounts at lvl20) and being chaises down by that Orc warrior. Good times, good times.

[california dog bite attorneys]

keep the blog up, i enjoy reading your words!

[Blumenreich Law Firm]

awesome blog, thank you for your words of wisdom!