Last week, the U.S. Department of Agriculture pulled back from issue regulations on genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa. Here are reactions, from Whole Foods Market to the American Farm Bureau.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 |
« New paleo reconstruction shows warmer periods in Alaska over the past 3000 years | Watts Up With That? | Main | American Thinker Blog: California global warming regulations voided by judge (updated) »
The comments to this entry are closed.
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL BLOGS: USDA Sides With GE Alfalfa | Daily Yonder | Keep It Rural masowcohraqmulberry
giuseppe zanotti http://www.vinimar.it/GZ/index.asp
Posted by: giuseppe zanotti | November 23, 2013 at 03:23 PM
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL BLOGS: USDA Sides With GE Alfalfa | Daily Yonder | Keep It Rural ovpucaparajumpers
giuseppe zanotti shoes http://www.gameslady.com/gz/index.asp
Posted by: giuseppe zanotti shoes | November 23, 2013 at 03:23 PM
403119803404592155742
gucci discount bags http://www.supersecrettestserver.com/gucci-discount-bags-authentic-gucci-discount-bags-for-sale/
Posted by: gucci discount bags | August 26, 2013 at 03:01 AM
I am encouraged to hear that atettpms by the EPA to unilaterally try to regulate CO2 as a pollutant is in the process of being curtailed by Congress.The EPA has not at all determined that the effects of global warming pollution harm public health they merely quoted or parroted the IPCC report and, worse, actually squashed reports and analyses by staff scientists which objectively questioned the notion that climate warming caused by human activity is settled science .The EPA's attempt to make traditional fuels more expensive by penalizing energy producers is completely counter-productive and not aligned with a legitimate objective of reducing dependence on foreign sources of energy.I demand that the EPA quit abusing its power and stick to its proscribed role of controlling actual pollution. CO2, as part of the cycle of life, can hardly be considered pollution, and, furthermore, theories of imminent demise due to rapid climate change brought about by a marginal increase in the amount of CO2 are theories whose main support is from hypothetical climate models which are certainly not a sufficient basis for declaring the science settled .EPA, please stick to your legitimate mission and get out of the global warming political racket.
Posted by: Agustina | October 25, 2012 at 02:21 PM