Hundreds of metres under one of
Iceland's largest glaciers there are signs of an imminent volcanic eruption that
could be one of the most powerful the country has seen in almost a century.
Mighty Katla, with its 10km (6.2 mile) crater, has the potential to cause
catastrophic flooding as it melts the frozen surface of its caldera and sends
billions of gallons of water surging through Iceland's east coast and into the
Atlantic Ocean.
"There has been a great deal of seismic activity," says Ford Cochran, the
National Geographic's expert on Iceland.
"There have been more than 500 tremors in and around the caldera of Katla
just in the last month, which suggests the motion of magma. And that certainly
suggests an eruption may be imminent."
Scientists in Iceland have been closely monitoring the area since 9 July,
when there appears to have been some sort of disturbance that may have been a
small eruption.
via www.bbc.co.uk
At the end of the BBC article, the author writes: "But the biggest threat to Iceland's icecaps is seen as climate change, not the volcanoes that sometimes melt the icecaps.
"They have begun to thin and retreat dramatically over the last few decades, contributing to the rise in sea levels that no eruption of Katla, however big, is likely to match."
The problem for the author is that this conclusion does not reflect the comments in the rest of the article, such as the quote from one expert:
"'Folks talk about a nuclear winter - this eruption generated enough sulphuric acid droplets that it made the atmosphere reflective, cooled the planet for an entire year or more and caused widespread famine in many places around the globe.
"'One certainly hopes that Katla's eruption will not be anything like that!'"
How exactly is such sudden, widespread "nuclear winter" devastation ( a previous Katla erruption wiped out 20% of Iceland's human population) not comparable in seriousness to gradual global warming? The author can only achieve his dramatic-sounding conclusion by switching the disussion from a threat to LIFE to a threat to the "ice caps".
With all due respect to the ice-cap constituency, despite an artistic longing for white-capped mountain ranges ice-cap melting is really noteworthy only because of what such melting may due to LIFE (by causing gradual rising sea levels). From the perspective of preserving life, it's pretty hard to compare gradual sea-level rises over hundreds of years to a sudden nuclear winter.